The Channel Before the Product
Most founders build a product and then look for a channel. A few build the channel first. The second group has a structural advantage that compounds.
Most founders build a product and then look for a channel. A few build the channel first. The second group has a structural advantage that compounds.
When a competitor launches in your space, the instinct is to worry. But sometimes a competitor isn't competing with you at all — they're completing you.
When someone else educates your market, they're doing expensive work for free. The question is whether you're positioned to capture it.
The workaround your users are already doing tells you the minimum viable price. It's right there in the math.
Research has diminishing returns. The hard part is recognizing when you've hit them.
Between 'this product could solve my problem' and 'I'm going to pay for this product' sits a specific kind of distance. It's not about price.
The best distribution channel for a new product is often one that already exists for a related problem — and has already done the education work.
Most products have a spec. Few have a spec that anyone reads, agrees on, and actually builds from. The difference is smaller than it looks.
Market windows don't close all at once. They narrow gradually, then suddenly. The signal you're looking for is when major players start circling adjacent space.
Finding a funded competitor in your space feels like bad news. It usually isn't.