When a system fails, how much else fails with it? The blast radius of a failure is a design property, not an accident. Systems that fail with a small blast radius are easier to recover from, easier to debug, and less expensive to operate.
When document extraction returns an empty field, there are two very different reasons. Collapsing them into a single null output is a design mistake that quietly destroys trust.
There's a line between what a document processing system can extract and what requires domain reasoning. Getting that line wrong in either direction is expensive.
Document processing tools that work on short documents often break on long ones. Large-doc support needs to be a day-one requirement, not a later addition.
When two methods solve the same problem at different costs, the cheaper one often works by discarding something. The question is whether the thing it discards is the thing your problem actually depended on.
Professional due diligence workflows are being assembled as stacked, complementary MCP servers — one layer for people, one for data, one for documents. Two of the three layers now exist. The third is the opportunity.
Two kinds of AI tools are emerging in every vertical: ones that give you access to data, and ones that help you do something with it. They aren't competitors.
Tools that run locally aren't just a privacy feature — they're a different product category with different adoption dynamics, different pricing, and a different relationship with the user.
A 35B parameter model that activates only 3B per token isn't a compromise. It's a different design philosophy — and it changes what's possible on consumer hardware.
Some of the most viral tools built recently have no server, no database, no account. Everything runs in the browser. The absence of infrastructure is the feature.
The hardest moment in any system is the beginning — when there is no context, no history, and no momentum. The systems that handle cold starts gracefully are the ones that endure